Friday, August 31, 2012

An open letter to the Prime Minister


Dear Prime Minister,

After a long time of cursing your government, I thought I will write to you.

You are a very respectable person in the government. After Nehru, you have been the only person to be the Prime Minister after completing a full five year term. In a country like ours this is indeed a great achievement.

You have been a globally renowned figure in the field of Economics. You have held very many prestigious positions of power in many Indian and foreign institutions. We all have high regard for you, as an economist.

During the Narasimha Rao prime ministerial-ship, in 1991, you freed India from the License Raj and brought in economic reforms. This exercise totally changed the economic facet of India. You have been lucky enough to have got all the accolades for that. But, it goes without saying that if at all you did not have a brave and risk taking Prime Minister like Mr. Rao, you would not have been able to do anything at all. This shows how important the role of a Prime Minister is, in a country like ours.

You have been lucky enough to be declared the Prime Minister by Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, this when she herself had an opportunity to hold that prestigious position of power. Is it that she sacrificed the most powerful position for you or was she denied the opportunity? This still remains ambiguous. Anyways, you were lucky. You had it and you continue to have it despite the galore of issues the UPA is undergoing, corruption being the front runner.

Your government has been infamous for the most number of scams and the humongous loss made to the exchequer (or gained by some individuals). Your ministers and MPs seem to be obsessed with breaking their own records of corruption. And I should tell you that you are gifted with very eloquent speakers in your government, who try to play with words and try to create a clean image of your government. Again, you are so lucky to have such people around. Apart from the money they loot, you should reward them for the brilliant work they do.

But, you will always have the curse of Anna Hazare. You deceived him and the people of India. You announced on the floor of the house that you would pass the Lokpal Bill and you sent a singed letter to Anna saying this, but you have not yet fulfilled that promise of yours. You unleashed the Income Tax department and the Enforcement Directorate behind Baba Ramdev and tried to somehow tarnish his image. In fact you have tried all means to stop these two activists from raising the issue of corruption.

The 2G scam happened right around you, but you wished to look away from it, and let it materialize. You had an escape route then, because the telecom ministry wasn’t directly under you. But now, in the coal-gate scam, you don’t. It was you who was at the helm of the coal ministry. Now how can you justify this? Are you searching for a scapegoat for the coal-gate too? Well, you may not be lucky in this minister!

Team Anna came out in the public with the draft CAG report that named you in the coal scam. They demanded for an independent SIT to probe the charges. You denied it vehemently. You also added that even if there is an iota of truth in their acquisitions, you would resign from public life.

Now that the CAG has submitted its final report and it still has your name mentioned, have you forgotten the statement that you gave? In 1993 you had submitted your resignation from the post of Finance Minister after a report mentioned that your office could not anticipate the securities scandal. What has changed you from 1993 and 2012? Mrs. Sonia Gandhi?

You, before leaving for Tehran, for the NAM summit, said that you were more concerned about the GDP growth and that you wanted it to happen fast. This was the justification you gave for subverting parliamentary procedures and allotting 142 coal mine blocks. Let alone the fact that most of the allottees were not capable of mining out the mineral and did contribute nothing for the GDP growth. Imagine what the situation would be if each and every minister in your cabinet does this subverting of parliamentary procedures! You also said that your maintaining silence has won over many issues. Sorry. This is not what we want from a Prime Minister. We want you to talk and articulate your stand. Why don’t you learn this art from your friend Manish Tewari?

After coming from the NAM summit, you said that there is no question of your resignation and that the CAG is not right. Also you blame the BJP for stalling the Parliament. You did whatever you wanted to in your way, which has been proven wrong, by a constitutional body, and now you shoot down all the people who point fingers at you? Are you in a primary school to act in such a childish manner? Does your silence remind you of your school days, when all the students were supposed to remain silent?

What is it that you are going to do? Are you going to let this political logjam prevail? Have you thought of something or are you waiting for Mrs. Sonia Gandhi’s orders? How does your conscience allow you to be Mrs. Sonia’s poodle all the time? In the last week of June, 2012, you had talked about unleashing ‘animal spirits’. Was Poodle the animal that you meant then?

The nation would be thankful to you and would restore the respect for you if you submit your resignation and keep away from politics. You are good as a teacher or researcher, why don’t you continue doing that? Or at least take some rest in your old age, you have done enough. You have been tagged as an ‘under achiever’, compared to a ‘shikhandi’, ‘dritarashtra’. Haven’t you been happy with these wonderful names you got? Or do you want more names to follow?

For all what you have done, remaining silent and letting the looters to do their job with much ease, you deserve the same punishment what Kasab is going to get. Sorry for being harsh, but you asked for it Mr. Prime Minister.

Hoping that you turn in to a tiger from a poodle soon!

With shame and grief,
A patriot.
Bharat Mata Ki Jai!

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

It's high time we stay away from the 'Engineering Rush'

In India, 2.5 million students pass out of school every year and a whopping 60% of them opt for Engineering as a career. Is India a country which can give 'true' employment opportunities to these 1.5 million engineers every year?

Class 12 is a very crucial academic year and we see students struggling in this period. The pressure from schools, tuition centres, parents and peers is just too much to take. Under this immense pressure, students fail to get enough time to even rationally think what they need to do next in life. Studies show that engineering has been the prominent choice for students, followed by medicine. The latter, requiring very high marks and given the fewer seats available, witnesses lesser number of students. What is it that makes engineering the most favoured choice among the students?

Firstly, the boom in the number of engineering colleges in India and the role played by private players has increased the availability of seats to a great extent. India is home to 3,393 engineering colleges with 14.86 lakh seats. The quality of education rendered in many of these institutions is of course questionable and debatable.

Secondly, the common perception that an engineering degree can fetch one employment easily is widespread. It is true that an engineering graduate gets employed easier, but the question is if the employment is proper and worth the four years an engineering graduate spent in college.

Thirdly, the social status associated with an engineering degree holder is more when compared to arts, commerce and home science degree holders. An engineering graduate is looked upon with much respect in the society, the reasons for which is unknown.

I bet to disagree with this Engineering Rush.

The state of engineering courses offered in India is abysmal and need huge changes for its revival. Lack of quality research and true innovation is writ large in our engineering institutions.

Most of the engineering graduates, irrespective of the stream of engineering they had graduated in, opt for software firms for employment. This, for the simple reasons that presently India is in much need for software developers or workers and these firms offer a better package than the other mainstream engineering firms.

These days there are many other courses in arts and commerce that gives a more enjoyable employment and social respect than engineering. Economists, lawyers, sociologists, charted accountants, journalists, statisticians, etcetera are well placed than engineers.

The only thing that makes engineering distinctive is that, a mere engineering degree can fetch one a job, but in other professions, like the ones mentioned above, one needs to be in the top creamy layer to get a reasonable job. This factor has been the driving force behind this engineering rush in India.

The students and the parents must realize this, and stay away from this rush. Only the students with true innovative, technical mind and passion should opt for engineering as a career. Else, we are not just doing injustice to the profession, but also to the nation as a whole because the statistics of engineering graduates and engineering innovations would show huge contrast.

Schools should play the lead in making the students understand the role of different professions and guiding them rather than just being an institution to conduct classes and examinations. It would be worth the investment if every school employs a full time career guide for this task.

Private players should invest more in educational institutions other than just engineering or technical institutions and bring in good teaching faculty. With the money invested to raise a normal engineering college, one can raise an excellent quality arts or science institution.

Engineering is not the only major option available to school leaving students, it is just one in many available options. Status quo may suit the students who blow with the wind and opt for engineering, but in a long run, the ones who resist the wind and take the path less taken by would benefit.

Jai Hind!


Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Has the media lost its relevance as the fourth estate, with special reference to the Indian democratic institutions?



The media plays a pivotal role in a democratic country like ours. We are gifted with the media, as a fourth estate, which acts as a pressure group and ensure the effective functioning of the three estates – the judiciary, the executive and the legislature. The Constitution of India provides immense liberality in terms of freedom of speech and expression, as a Fundamental Right, which has been the backbone of the Indian media. With deep penetration of technology, media has now-a-days been able to deliver its duties fantastically. The media has been given extreme importance by all the people, right from a poor rural Indian, to the elite corporate fraternity and to the highly positioned politicians. Also, all of us do consider the media as a part and parcel of our lives. This is evident from the fact that India has humongous news channels and newspapers. There are over 72,000 publications registered with the Registrar of Newspapers of India and over 350 news and current affairs channels. Also, India is now the fastest growing and biggest newspaper market in the world; having pipped China with currently over 110 million copies sold each day! The media has been very functional in terms of exposing a number of crimes that our society witnesses and in keeping track of those until justice is delivered to the aggrieved. It has also been able to reduce the rural-urban divide in terms of disseminating information on culture, technology, trends, etc. effectively.

Media is not only playing this role of extreme importance in India, but in the entire world. The recent struggle in many countries, to overthrow their rulers and also to put a democratic system in place, widely referred to as the ‘Arab Spring’ was also largely successful because of the tireless and fearless role the media played.

The Indian media has certainly been successful to a great extent in raising awareness about major issues among the entire 1.2 billion population of India. It covers the entire length and breadth of the Indian Territory. It acts as an eye opener to its viewers. The present day media, unlike of the past, has been able to expedite the dissemination of information to a great extent, thanks to the technology advancements.

The Indian media is possessed with enormous power as it is the third eye of the common man. The way media presents an issue to the viewers helps in shaping a perspective in every common man’s mind. Hence, the way in which media presents each and every issue becomes extremely crucial. It is capable of bringing small issues to the fore and also showing major events in the dark. This discretionary power of the media lies in the hands of the owners of media houses and also the top editors. Hence it is highly imperative that these people think rationally and in an unbiased manner. 

The media houses choose among various issues, taking into consideration the Television Rating Points (TRP) they obtain. Having such an approach of selectively categorizing issues can be highly detrimental and will lead to biased publishing. For the greed of money, some editors give more importance to only those issues which fetch them more moolah, often referred to as ‘paid news’. Such acts done by some channels or publications can raise serious questions on the credibility of the entire media, as a whole.

The media also, at times deliberately divert attention from certain issues either for their own vested interests or under pressure from the higher echelons of the society. They, at times, blow hot and cold on issues which confuse the viewers and also make it difficult for them to judge the situation. Civil society movements are the most affected with such acts of the media. The media’s unstable publishing of the recent anti-corruption movement and the anti-Koodankulam nuclear power project are some of the examples to substantiate this.

The media also reads too much between the lines causing more trouble to the people involved. Politicians often fall into this trap of the media. Journalists, reporters, writers and editors should hence not go too much in depth into the issues, without proper background study. A media publication which did such an act recently regarding the movement of Army units without prior notification an issuing a warning of a coup, raised serious concerns within the army and also the Prime Minister’s office. Such acts create a bad image on the media.

The media also, by itself, investigates issues and conducts sting operations. Most of these prove to be true. The recent sting operations conducted by the media on the ‘tatkal’ railway ticket booking and doctors conducting illegal sonographic tests and ‘selling’ of babies provided a good proof for the law enforcement agencies to act upon. Here again the media should maintain its ‘lakshman rekha’. Recently, a video tape showing a senior politician in bad light was aired without any proper background checks. Very soon it was removed and stopped from being aired. Such acts can cause high damage to a person’s integrity. The media should hence ensure the authenticity of the video tapes and also take full responsibility of its publishing and should be ready to face the ramifications.

The media also shows nuance regional bias in publishing and covering the issues. The coverage of to the recent Assam riots can be an example of this nuance regional bias. Had such a riot happened in any other region other than that of the North East, the manner in which the media handled the situation would have been entirely different. Many critical issues happening in the north-eastern regions of the Indian Territory has not been covered widely. It is only when the issues boil and reach the peak; the media takes interest in those.

Similarly issues regarding health care, nutrition, sports, etc. do not manage to hit the headlines of our media and hence are underplayed.

However, having said all this, when it comes to our democratic institutions, the Indian media has never remained on the back foot. The media, in fact, has been highly dynamic and pro-active in covering issues related to the judiciary, the executive and the legislature. Hence, on issues related to administration and governance, the Indian media has given special attention. This special attention given to these estates make them more vigilant and perform their functions effectively.

The judiciary has been the most respected estate and the Constitution provides it with enormous powers and hence the judiciary itself acts as a check to the executive and the legislature. Even such a powerful judiciary is under a constant watch of the Indian media. Media follows every trial; understand its judgments and then carry further debate on it. Though it cannot make the judiciary change its final decision by force, it acts as a strong pressure group and helps the judiciary in knowing the public sentiments on certain issues of national importance. 

Cases like the one of death sentence to the three perpetrators of the Rajiv Gandhi assassination, the 1992 Bhanwari Devi gang rape case, the 1999 Jessica Lal murder case, the more recent 2008 Aarushi-Hemraj double murder case, etc. were and are, closely watched by the media. Some of these involved top politicians but still the media has not deterred from publishing the news. Hence media makes the judgments made by the judges, under public scrutiny. This attention the media provide is functional and hence it does have an impact on the cases.

The Indian executive is a huge organization and is responsible for the day to day affairs of the nation. It is directly responsible for the growth and fall of the nation due to the policies it adopt. The executive includes the bureaucracy, with a plethora of civil servants and the council of ministers headed by the Prime Minister. Even this large executive does not miss the media attention. Each and every policy adopted or rejected is discussed at length by the media and it explains to the common man why the particular action was taken and if that action was right or wrong. This puts immense pressure on the working of the executive.

But the pressure put on the executive, is essential to make them perform their duties in a better way. Had there been no media, the policy discussions and decisions would not have been known to the aam admi at all. It would have remained known only to the bureaucrats and the ministers.

Issues like the 123 nuclear agreement, the international environmental summits, the recent ones like the FDI in retail, the Lokpal, the MGNREGA scheme, etc. were brought to the fore front by the media. The media does the work of an informer and thus ensures true participative policy making.

The legislature too is under the watch of the media. The exclusive television channels for the Rajya Sabha and the Lok Sabha keep showing live of what is happening inside the Parliament. Media also does highlights when some serious issue happens in the Parliament. The media hence helps people to be aware of the discussions going on inside the Parliament and put forth different perspectives before the people. Interviews with Parliamentarians help the people to realize what the representatives elected by them, are doing for them. Such interviews help the people to choose between the candidates in the future elections. Hence media upholds our democracy.

Even the work of various commissions and committees set up by the government are under the media watch. When the Chairman of the National Commission for Women had named the victim of the Guwahati molestation case in public, the media took up the issue and debated it very constructively. It gave out a large message that naming of the victim in public was wrong and that such commissions should ensure that their members be more cautious while talking. Even the Thorat committee’s report on the removal of 21 cartoons was debated at length in the print and visual media.  It raised serious questions if the removal of content from the textbook just because there was uproar in the Parliament was essential.

The media also aid the constitutional bodies in spreading the message they send out. The CAG reports, though opposed by many Parliamentarians because it named some of them, were sent out to the public, by the media. The corruption and mishandling of funds in government sectors was exposed by the CAG report and the media did not abstain from publishing it. Many rules notified by the CEC during elections are also sent out to the large public by the media, like the caps in election campaign spending. Media themselves carry out investigations to check the political parties. Even the Panchayati Raj Institutions are under the watch of the media. Even the working of a village Sarpanch is keenly looked by the media. Those which are bad are exposed and corrective measures are ensured. Good too are exposed so that it sets a right example to the neighboring villages.  The media also exposes the works of a number of RTI activists, which become a source of inspiration for others. Alongside it helps in raising awareness about the working of government or government funded bodies. 

The media plays a very vital role in a nation like ours. They are a driving force in orienting the minds of the common man. They ensure information is reached to the people as early and effectively as possible. It also ensures constructive democracy. The media, in India is a very powerful tool. It is owned by the elite class and some by politicians. While performing its functions, it should remain free from the clutches of the elite class and the politicians. It should also stick to high ethics, morals and values. It should keep the national interests ahead of the personal gains. If the media does not follow such ethics, not only will the media lose its relevance, but also a new ‘avatar’ of media will take birth – the Social Media. The social media has already been very effective in mobilizing public opinion. Many movements have tasted success because of its effective exploitation of the social media. Social media also has the connection to the youth, which makes it even more powerful. Hence, the birth of social media, as an alternative to the conventional media can be witnessed if the latter becomes dysfunctional.

The freedom of press in India is quite high. This can lead to major problems. Statutory bodies like the Press Council of India, which governs the conduct of print media, should be empowered to a great extent so that these check the functioning of the media. Such statutory bodies for visual media should also be constituted. Only such powerful bodies can be a watchdog to the highly powerful Indian media and prevent it from being destructive. 

Unveiling a thought of mine on the Independence Day


I would like to unveil a thought which was there in my mind for a long time, on this Independence Day.


It is regarding the Indian weddings. A minute of thinking can enlighten you on the money, even an average Indian middle class family, spends on a wedding. Right from consulting as many number of astrologers in town as possible (just to confuse us more) to expensive invitation cards (which anyways goes to the thrash once the date is noted on the calendar) to huge wedding halls (just to increase the electrical power requirement) to professional cameramen to video shoot the entire ceremony (to see and re-see the same events and get bored some day) to sumptuous food (which cannot be eaten by most) and the list goes on. All these expenses just for a matter of five to six hours. And mind me, this may cost a family a lakh or even more, on a minimal lower estimate. Also do not forget the fact that I have not included the major expense of the present day wedding - the Gold! The Gold Rush! Isn't this a bit too much? 

Just because the wedding is a once in a lifetime affair, is so much spending really needed? Can spending so much on an event even be justified? I could not understand why people are not just ready to shed their prejudice and go ahead with a simple ceremony, which a wedding is actually supposed to be. 


Why can't we, the youth, take a firm decision that our weddings and the weddings of our close relatives and friends shall be conducted in a very simple manner? 


I have a definition to this 'simple' wedding I say. Many may reject my view, many may find it preposterous. I am not forcing anyone to adopt this either. But I am sure, my wedding will be in this manner.


Why can't a wedding ceremony be conducted in a temple or a mosque or a church, in presence of just the bride, the bridegroom and both their parents. After the ring or the 'maala' exchange let them go back home, have a good home made lunch and spend the time for themselves. Some day later, let them go to each and every relatives' houses with a box of sweets and spend some time with all of them. This would be a herculean task, but it has its own advantages. This will help the bride or bridegroom understand the family better rather than shaking hands with all the people coming on the stage, one after the other, just for a minute, then another minute to pose themselves to be be photographed. How silly this is! This system is being followed because it really favours the status-quo - this materialistic world, where each minute is worth some Rupees. Just for the sake of it we have all our relatives and friends on the stage on a day and get a photograph clicked (as if for a proof of attendance). 


If a wedding is a once in a lifetime affair and we value it so much, then why do people hesitate to spend some days for it, rather than just some hours? 


This can save huge burden, energy and money and the saved money can be used for charity (if one chooses to). The money we spend in a wedding, if received by a poor family, would be enough to carry out all their expenses for a quarter year or even more. This will include their expenses from food to dress to children's education to travel and what not. Think it over friends, it is we, the youth alone, who can change this system.


We have the energy within us, the will is all what we need. 


Jai Hind!